(12-03-2019, 09:44 PM)Marko Wrote: (12-03-2019, 09:33 PM)wyze0ne Wrote: (12-03-2019, 08:20 PM)jaro101969 Wrote: Since this is the first Gillette DE razor since 1980 for the US market this would definitely be an item to put in any collection especially if you were to have the previous ones made. and i have felt this whole time that it would be a great way to bring in new shavers to the wet shaving community that may not recognize the artisan names but would recognize the name Gillette....
Except....it's not a Gillette razor.
Of course that leads us down the path of which brands do or don't make their own product? If a product is made under licence/contract to the brands' specifications, is that sufficient? Is there anything wrong with the practice? Would it have made a difference in this case if Gillette had stamped their name on the razor? Is a VW manufactured in Germany better than a VW manufactured in Mexico?
It makes a difference to me whether the head - wherever and by whomever it was manufactured - is uniquely Gillette or not. In this case it appears not even close to unique. I've seen people whom I respect say - in this very thread IIRC - that Gillette contracted out production back in the day too. But I have not heard it said that back in the day, the same thing as a contracted out Gillette razor was also produced under other brands. Granted, I am no expert at Gillette history, so maybe I am missing the boat in some appreciable way.
But nevertheless, and keeping that caveat in mind, the current situation is something like this
to my way of thinking: If I buy a Lamborghini (in my dreams of course lol), I don't care where the leather in the seats came from. There can be many things contracted out, but they won't add up to even a reasonable facsimile of a Lamborghini, unless you get the Lamborghini. OTOH, if I buy a can of corn, I don't care if it has the Green Giant brand or the supermarket brand. The nutrition labels are identical or very, very nearly so. The corn is a commodity. The Lamborghini is not.
So IMHO Gillette is selling cans of corn. We can argue over details of the supply chain, but a can of corn is a can of corn. Instead of putting lipstick on a pig, you pick some label you like, and you put it on the can of corn. In and of itself, my personal reaction is
Big f***ing deal, which is part of why I have not purchased the Heritage. What I am waiting to find out, is whether Gillette will produce anything innovative, will they license and produce a copy of some innovative contemporary design (s), or will they mass produce faithful reproductions of one or more classic Gillette designs? (I doubt the last possibility for a variety of reasons.)
And yes to two things. First, Gillette arguably was not the Lamborghini of the razor world. I know that. Nevertheless, they still have room for improvement over a non-stainless, cobbled together frankenrazor with a sloppily made handle. And second, yes, the current can of corn frankenrazor appears to be a serviceable razor in good working order, meaning it is adequate both to give a lifetime of yeoman service (if not dropped), and to grow the practice of traditional shaving. Gillette deserves wholehearted props for that much. Just please do forgive me if I don't break out in a cold sweat at the sight of it.