(This post was last modified: 05-25-2019, 09:28 PM by Tbone.)
(05-25-2019, 02:44 AM)ohoho Wrote: The common law of business
balance prohibits paying a little and
getting a lot... It can't be done.
That is not always true. Look at traditional wetshaving vs. cartridge shaving, or the the Ming Shi 2000s vs. the Merkur Futur. Gillette invented double-edge safety razors and blades. Every other brand is a copy or close derivative.
(05-25-2019, 03:13 AM)Oasisdave Wrote: Link? And it's just to see it, I have a legit Wolfman
dmiller622 might be able to provide a link, as he seems to know about the clones. Like I said, I was being facetious. I was really surprised to read that someone is actually cloning the Wolfman. My bad, as it should have been no surprise.
https://damnfineshave.com/thread-who%E2%...#pid265415
I found an article today on Sharpologist that actually shows one of the Wolfman clones. So they have been around for at least 9 months. It might just be a sorta lookalike rather than a clone, though. The article also has some interesting insights on razor clones and copies, and why some succeed and others fail.
Copies, Clones, And Conterfeits In The Wet Shaving World
https://sharpologist.com/2018/10/copies-...world.html
(05-25-2019, 05:13 AM)CCity Wrote: There's a lot here in this quote. I'm a lawyer spending most of my time addressing music licensing issues. The amount of theft in the music world is staggering, both through copyright infringement and music business distribution infrastructure. Artists of any stripe, music or razor designers, deserve our support.
Downloading is still an issue? I haven't heard of anyone doing that in forever. Why would they when a world of music is available for free on Spotify, Pandora, and other streaming services? It would be like hot wiring a Yugo when a Camaro can be had for free.