#61
That is a crap move. One that I would be willing to boycott them for.

Standard likes this post
Joe
#62
This is the business world. I don't like what happened but I think they must have seen it coming.
#63
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2020, 07:35 PM by jmudrick.)
(06-03-2020, 07:23 PM)keto Wrote: Wow  That stinks. Come on Yaqi Really!
(06-03-2020, 07:24 PM)kooshman7 Wrote: That is a crap move. One that I would be willing to boycott them for.
Blame capitalism and the go between first. The story so far does not indicate Yaqi had any arrangements or understandings with Heritage.

Sent from my LG-US998 using Tapatalk

ischiapp likes this post
#64
As part of the business world, when they do crap things like that, the consumer is the ultimate decider. Never take for granted what a small subset of dissenters can do to a company’s bottom line. That’s also part of business, and one companies would do well to remember in their pursuit of ever increasing profit. It can quickly go awry and throw a wrench into the most profitable of companies.
Joe
#65

It's sharp and it cuts. I like it...
Northeast, USA
(06-03-2020, 07:20 PM)jmudrick Wrote:
(06-03-2020, 07:14 PM)CK89 Wrote:
(06-03-2020, 06:02 PM)GlazedBoker Wrote: [font=-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont,]That was a shit move by the Chinese manufacturer if you ask me. But, I'm not surprised at all either that this happened. It's their mo....[/font]

This is sad... Not surprised either...
Yaqi seems not to have had any agreement at all with Heritage, so it doesn't shock me to see them pick up and modify a non patent protected design brought to them. The unnamed go between is another story.

Sent from my LG-US998 using Tapatalk

Perhaps. Still, the world is getting smaller and smaller with all the information that gets put out on social media outlets. They knew the deal from the get go. They stepped on someone's idea to bring a razor to fruition. There is no recourse in terms of the legalities or infringements upon a patented idea as Heritage did not want to use the Gibbs name. You're right that the go between is the one that flipped on Heritage. But, either way that it gets sliced, Yaqi knew and they jumped at the opportunity out of sheer greed.

kooshman7 and Gopneg like this post
#66
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2020, 07:36 PM by kooshman7.)
(06-03-2020, 07:32 PM)jmudrick Wrote:
(06-03-2020, 07:24 PM)kooshman7 Wrote: That is a crap move. One that I would be willing to boycott them for.
Blame capitalism and the go between first. The story so far does not indicate Yaqi had any arrangements or understandings with Heritage.

Sent from my LG-US998 using Tapatalk

Technically I can blame whomever I please. Consumers aren’t exactly a rational lot at all times. This reminds me of the bs Stirling went through with their disingenuous machine shop outsourcing the work to China when the shop knew the consumer wanted products made solely in the U.S.

jmudrick, AQU, ischiapp and 1 others like this post
Joe
#67
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2020, 08:01 PM by jmudrick.)
(06-03-2020, 07:34 PM)GlazedBoker Wrote:
(06-03-2020, 07:20 PM)jmudrick Wrote:
(06-03-2020, 07:14 PM)CK89 Wrote: This is sad... Not surprised either...
Yaqi seems not to have had any agreement at all with Heritage, so it doesn't shock me to see them pick up and modify a non patent protected design brought to them. The unnamed go between is another story.

Sent from my LG-US998 using Tapatalk

Perhaps. Still, the world is getting smaller and smaller with all the information that gets put out on social media outlets. They knew the deal from the get go. They stepped on someone's idea to bring a razor to fruition. There is no recourse in terms of the legalities or infringements upon a patented idea as Heritage did not want to use the Gibbs name. You're right that the go between is the one that flipped on Heritage. But, either way that it gets sliced, Yaqi knew and they jumped at the opportunity out of sheer greed.
Ok, if Yaqi was fully aware bad on them but I'd still like some ire directed at the party with whom Heritage did have agreements.

The Gibbs adjustment mechanism patent dates to 1936, pretty unlikely a patent could have been obtained under any circumstances for a replica whether or not the name Gibbs was involved..

Sent from my LG-US998 using Tapatalk

CK89 likes this post
#68
My congrats to the Yaqi Legal department.

Yaqi has taken the design given to them for contract manufacturing, stolen and made minor updates to that design, and now marketing the razor. In the mean time, Yaqi has ceased any contractual obligations of the designer and middle man. And this is apparently legal !
#69
In communist China it is.
Happy shaves
SMURF

FloridaCreekIndian likes this post
#70
Standard smurfups77 Isn't that what the Chinese have been doing to the West for the last 35 years. They have no regard for intellectual property and will steal anything creative or otherwise. At least with this recent "theft" I will save money and not be purchasing some inferior Chinese knockoff - I will happily wait until it made by an honest company. Hear that Yaqi ... NOT INTERESTED slime bags

Now if Clouds could make his adjuster plate or that jig available I am sure there would be many interested in "upgrading" their Gibbs like his brass handle/extension

GlazedBoker, CzechCzar, Standard and 3 others like this post


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)