(06-27-2016, 04:50 AM)Marko Wrote:(06-27-2016, 12:11 AM)Freddy Wrote:(06-26-2016, 11:00 PM)Marko Wrote: I hear you, I prefer the wilderness outdoors to the city and Toronto with a metro are population of 6.324 million is as city as it gets in Canada. If I were to spend much time in any large Canadian city it would be Vancouver.
Isn't it funny how we each like to live. I would so choose Toronto or Montréal over small town living. Vancouver and Victoria are gorgeous, I admit, but they simply do not have the sophistication of the other two. I wasn't in Québec City long enough but what I saw, I liked. I have never been to other large Canadian cities like Winnepeg, Calgary, or Edmonton but wonder if they are more like our somewhat larger midwestern cities here in the U.S., which is to say not like our East and West Coast cities.
What I like in Calgary or Vancouver or Victoria is that the wilderness, mountains, forests, oceans etc are right there. You can see them and be in them miles from anybody in minutes. Toronto and Montreal are just unending urban sprawl, crumbling old cities. They do have their attraction to be sure but I can only take so much before I need mountains and forests to feed my soul. Obviously lots of people enjoy the big cities and that's fine with me. I've not spent much time in any Midwestern cities so I couldn't compare. I have a sister that lives in Rochester, Minnesota. Maybe I should visit her and see?
LOL, Marko, I am the exact opposite. I love to visit beautiful countryside but only for a while. Ultimately, I find I need the vibe of the city. It seems obvious to me that, in their own ways, each is needed.