Starman Wrote:For further clarity,
Here is a quick shot of the exact blade I used as an example shim, measuring exactly 0.10
So yes, 1 x blade shim is in the ballpark of increasing a 1.15 to 1.25 for example...
Other blades may vary in minute measurements, but negligible within shaving tolerances...this is of course my personal view....
Starman Wrote:Tony,
Quote: "I'm an Ex-Professional Racer, and you could live in my Box! "
If my wife finds out how much shaving is costing........I may have to accept this offer? and come live in your Snap-On box!
Sure! I could even include a couple of sandwiches a day and look at it as a security expense!
(09-29-2019, 03:30 PM)Roydrage Wrote: Okay...
So Who's Going To Be the First to Put A Blade / Shim / Blade / Shim / Blade And Make The First Multi Blade WOLFMAN !?!
Tony
You would need a spacer to separate blades and somehow separate the angle like that Russian razor (I cannot recall the name). I tried it and it was a terribly harsh and ineffective activity using a mostly plastic razor. It’s now landfill.
(09-29-2019, 08:46 PM)Dayman Wrote: Has anyone compared the wr2 to the Karve? The way the blade is held looks similar to the Karve. The blade looks fairly flat and to have a low exposure, high gap like Karve. The Karve is ok, but I didn’t like it as much as most people. If the WR2 is similar, I think I’ll probably go for another WR1.
The Karve is the most wr2-esqe razor currently made. I can draw many comparable metrics and feelings from one to the other. Finish wise though....no comparison.
(09-29-2019, 07:22 PM)Ivan Reis Wrote:When I’ve tried a single stainless shim the change in efficacy is there but minimal. I notice a real difference in cutting efficiency using 2 shims and using 3 shims just changes it for me. This is with any razor in my hands.(09-29-2019, 07:11 PM)Starman Wrote: Fantastic!!
Your feedback I have no doubt shall be most welcomed and invaluable to those of us waiting in line....
Can I ask why you are going up 2 sizes from 105 to 125?
What are your initial thoughts pre shave?
In my last shave I used one shim (rising from 1.05 to 1.15) and I'm not sure if there was really a gain in efficiency.
So I will take the test tomorrow with two shims.
(09-29-2019, 10:55 PM)Kehole Wrote:(09-29-2019, 08:46 PM)Dayman Wrote: Has anyone compared the wr2 to the Karve? The way the blade is held looks similar to the Karve. The blade looks fairly flat and to have a low exposure, high gap like Karve. The Karve is ok, but I didn’t like it as much as most people. If the WR2 is similar, I think I’ll probably go for another WR1.
The Karve is the most wr2-esqe razor currently made. I can draw many comparable metrics and feelings from one to the other. Finish wise though....no comparison.
I think i might have asked this previously, but for the sake of my own validation, can any Wolfman WR2 gaps be compared to any Karve plates?
(09-29-2019, 10:55 PM)Kehole Wrote:This makes me rethink the WR2. I decided to sell a razor when I filled out the order form for the wr2 and the Karve is the one I chose to get rid of. I’m starting to think I might want another wr1, but in a different gap than what I currently have. I had both Karve F plates and I originally ordered the D SB plate, but I just didn’t find it smooth until the second pass. There were certain spots that gave me trouble on the first pass if my angle was not spot on.(09-29-2019, 08:46 PM)Dayman Wrote: Has anyone compared the wr2 to the Karve? The way the blade is held looks similar to the Karve. The blade looks fairly flat and to have a low exposure, high gap like Karve. The Karve is ok, but I didn’t like it as much as most people. If the WR2 is similar, I think I’ll probably go for another WR1.
The Karve is the most wr2-esqe razor currently made. I can draw many comparable metrics and feelings from one to the other. Finish wise though....no comparison.
(09-30-2019, 12:22 AM)Dayman Wrote:(09-29-2019, 10:55 PM)Kehole Wrote:This makes me rethink the WR2. I decided to sell a razor when I filled out the order form for the wr2 and the Karve is the one I chose to get rid of. I’m starting to think I might want another wr1, but in a different gap than what I currently have. I had both Karve F plates and I originally ordered the D SB plate, but I just didn’t find it smooth until the second pass. There were certain spots that gave me trouble on the first pass if my angle was not spot on.(09-29-2019, 08:46 PM)Dayman Wrote: Has anyone compared the wr2 to the Karve? The way the blade is held looks similar to the Karve. The blade looks fairly flat and to have a low exposure, high gap like Karve. The Karve is ok, but I didn’t like it as much as most people. If the WR2 is similar, I think I’ll probably go for another WR1.
The Karve is the most wr2-esqe razor currently made. I can draw many comparable metrics and feelings from one to the other. Finish wise though....no comparison.
Yeah for me both the wr2 and the Karve are perhaps the 2 smoothest razors made today. Go figure.
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)