SOTD 10.01.01
Wolfman WR1 .94mm OC on a Darwin
Personna Lab Blue
GD preshave and soap
DG B7
First shave with the 94OC, ordered from the e-mail form, that arrived yesterday. With the WR2 head getting all the attention, the WR1 gets overlooked. It shouldn't. It's a different kind of shaver but just as good. I hope bumping this old thread will help some of the new guys research thoroughly before they order. The WR1 is no slouch in the upper gaps.
(10-01-2019, 04:05 PM)LOOT Wrote: First shave with the 94OC, ordered from the e-mail form, that arrived yesterday. With the WR2 head getting all the attention, the WR1 gets overlooked. It shouldn't. It's a different kind of shaver but just as good. I hope bumping this old thread will help some of the new guys research thoroughly before they order. The WR1 is no slouch in the upper gaps.
Looks beautiful! Gotta admit I would have lost money betting you would not buy an OC WM
(10-02-2019, 08:59 PM)IanG153 Wrote:(10-01-2019, 04:05 PM)LOOT Wrote: First shave with the 94OC, ordered from the e-mail form, that arrived yesterday. With the WR2 head getting all the attention, the WR1 gets overlooked. It shouldn't. It's a different kind of shaver but just as good. I hope bumping this old thread will help some of the new guys research thoroughly before they order. The WR1 is no slouch in the upper gaps.
Looks beautiful! Gotta admit I would have lost money betting you would not buy an OC WM
Kinda weird, I know. Actually, I've come to really appreciate the WR1 OC. I have more of them than SB. Ida lost money too, Ian.
Still no fan of the WR2 OC, however.
(10-02-2019, 11:20 PM)LOOT Wrote:What is it that you don’t like about the wr2 OC? I typically prefer OCs, but it seems like a majority of the people who post prefer the SB in the WR2. I have the 61 OC, but I want to get one with a higher gap. I’m still debating in another wr1 or a wr2 when I get to place my order.(10-02-2019, 08:59 PM)IanG153 Wrote:(10-01-2019, 04:05 PM)LOOT Wrote: First shave with the 94OC, ordered from the e-mail form, that arrived yesterday. With the WR2 head getting all the attention, the WR1 gets overlooked. It shouldn't. It's a different kind of shaver but just as good. I hope bumping this old thread will help some of the new guys research thoroughly before they order. The WR1 is no slouch in the upper gaps.
Looks beautiful! Gotta admit I would have lost money betting you would not buy an OC WM
Kinda weird, I know. Actually, I've come to really appreciate the WR1 OC. I have more of them than SB. Ida lost money too, Ian.
Still no fan of the WR2 OC, however.
(10-02-2019, 11:38 PM)Dayman Wrote:(10-02-2019, 11:20 PM)LOOT Wrote:What is it that you don’t like about the wr2 OC? I typically prefer OCs, but it seems like a majority of the people who post prefer the SB in the WR2. I have the 61 OC, but I want to get one with a higher gap. I’m still debating in another wr1 or a wr2 when I get to place my order.(10-02-2019, 08:59 PM)IanG153 Wrote: Looks beautiful! Gotta admit I would have lost money betting you would not buy an OC WM
Kinda weird, I know. Actually, I've come to really appreciate the WR1 OC. I have more of them than SB. Ida lost money too, Ian.
Still no fan of the WR2 OC, however.
I had the 115 and 125OC. For me, the 125OC got bit harsh. The 115 was tolerable. There was no noticeable difference in efficiency in either of the DC heads I had, comparing SB to OC. The only difference was a loss in face feel. It's just not worth it to me. I don't have any of those issues with the WR1 head.
(10-03-2019, 01:13 PM)LOOT Wrote:That makes sense. I had the Karve F SB and F OC. I found the OC to be smoother, but it was a little much for me to use daily. I was able to use the F daily, or at least 4 days in a row when I traveled. I very rarely used it at home. When you say loss in face feel, do you mean there was more blade feel with the OC?(10-02-2019, 11:38 PM)Dayman Wrote:(10-02-2019, 11:20 PM)LOOT Wrote: Kinda weird, I know. Actually, I've come to really appreciate the WR1 OC. I have more of them than SB. Ida lost money too, Ian.What is it that you don’t like about the wr2 OC? I typically prefer OCs, but it seems like a majority of the people who post prefer the SB in the WR2. I have the 61 OC, but I want to get one with a higher gap. I’m still debating in another wr1 or a wr2 when I get to place my order.
Still no fan of the WR2 OC, however.
I had the 115 and 125OC. For me, the 125OC got bit harsh. The 115 was tolerable. There was no noticeable difference in efficiency in either of the DC heads I had, comparing SB to OC. The only difference was a loss in face feel. It's just not worth it to me. I don't have any of those issues with the WR1 head.
Users browsing this thread: