#221
(11-10-2018, 01:47 AM)TheHunter Wrote: I was able to snag a Polished WR2 SB 1.15 Gap with WRH2 Standard Handle and WRA1 Stand. I’m excited to see how the WR2 1.15 Gap compares to the WR1 .67 and .74 Gap Razors that I own.
Yes please let us know how that shaves is that the largest gap you can get

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

herbert7890 likes this post
#222
(11-10-2018, 02:27 AM)rawfox1 Wrote:
(11-10-2018, 01:47 AM)TheHunter Wrote: I was able to snag a Polished WR2 SB 1.15 Gap with WRH2 Standard Handle and WRA1 Stand. I’m excited to see how the WR2 1.15 Gap compares to the WR1 .67 and .74 Gap Razors that I own.
Yes please let us know how that shaves is that the largest gap you can get

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


1.25 is the largest. First batch, per James was .97

herbert7890 likes this post
#223
I'd also be interested in a comparison of blade gaps and which gap would be equivalent to 0.91 OC in the WR2 head.

herbert7890 likes this post
#224
(11-10-2018, 02:27 AM)rawfox1 Wrote:
(11-10-2018, 01:47 AM)TheHunter Wrote: I was able to snag a Polished WR2 SB 1.15 Gap with WRH2 Standard Handle and WRA1 Stand. I’m excited to see how the WR2 1.15 Gap compares to the WR1 .67 and .74 Gap Razors that I own.
Yes please let us know how that shaves is that the largest gap you can get

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
1.25 is the largest WR2....94 is the largest WR1 that I have/know of.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Shavemd and herbert7890 like this post
#225
(11-10-2018, 02:32 AM)bkatbamna Wrote: I'd also be interested in a comparison of blade gaps and which gap would be equivalent to 0.91 OC in the WR2 head.
I'm hoping the 1.25 is close to the 91/94...if not, I'm back on the hunt and begging for a 1.35/1.45.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Christopher_Henson, TheHunter and Deus Vult like this post
#226
Gents, I’ve had the WR2 OC 1.15 for about a week (see my review on ATG). The razors is similar to a WR1 OC @ 0.86 in term of efficiency, but it’s smoother. An amazing razor IMO. Lovely blade feel, efficient, light with the hollow handle. Can’t fail it.

Gravity, Anick, Christopher_Henson and 3 others like this post
#227
(11-10-2018, 06:34 PM)carbold Wrote: Gents, I’ve had the WR2 OC 1.15 for about a week (see my review on ATG). The razors is similar to a WR1 OC @ 0.86 in term of efficiency, but it’s smoother. An amazing razor IMO. Lovely blade feel, efficient, light with the hollow handle. Can’t fail it.
That's what I needed to hear. The 86 is one of my favorites.

The 1.25 must be close to a 94, which I also like.

Thanks for the info.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

TheHunter, Christopher_Henson and carbold like this post
#228
Then I made the right call at 1.05

LOOT, TheHunter, carbold and 2 others like this post
#229
(11-10-2018, 06:34 PM)carbold Wrote: Gents, I’ve had the WR2 OC 1.15 for about a week (see my review on ATG). The razors is similar to a WR1 OC @ 0.86 in term of efficiency, but it’s smoother. An amazing razor IMO. Lovely blade feel, efficient, light with the hollow handle. Can’t fail it.

I read your review. It explain how you got it before anyone else, it seems. I've had nothing but excellent customer service from him as well.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

carbold likes this post
#230

Member
AZ, USA
(11-10-2018, 06:34 PM)carbold Wrote: Gents, I’ve had the WR2 OC 1.15 for about a week (see my review on ATG). The razors is similar to a WR1 OC @ 0.86 in term of efficiency, but it’s smoother. An amazing razor IMO. Lovely blade feel, efficient, light with the hollow handle. Can’t fail it.

I’ve got a SB 1.15 coming at some point. The highest blade gap WR1 I’ve used is a .74, so I’m curious to see how this one  works out for me. I was hoping that the 1.15 would be around the .74 in efficiency, but I will gladly take more efficiency as long as it’s smooth. Guess I’ll have to wait and see. If it’s too much for me, I’ll be looking to add a 1.05 in the future.

carbold and LOOT like this post
Hunter


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)