#31
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2018, 07:36 PM by Dayman.)
(12-01-2018, 06:09 AM)ShyGuyx Wrote:
(12-01-2018, 03:45 AM)Shavemd Wrote:
(11-30-2018, 09:55 PM)ShyGuyx Wrote: I have a question if someone can help. I own a Wolfman .67 SB SS but I want to up the efficiency and I’m thinking of purchasing the .86 gap when I get a chance. Also I want to experience a bit more blade feel. I also own a karve razor the C plate which is a  .85 gap a shy of the Wolfman .86. By looking at both razors the head geometry looks quite similar. The Karve C is perfect for me in terms of efficiency and blade, would you say the Wolfman .86 feels the same at Karve C plate?

This would help me massively if someone has experience both with razor/gaps. It’s not easy to purchase a Wolfman directly. I just want to make the right decision when I gets the chance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Karve gap is slightly deceiving as far as blade feel because the blade is slightly recessed. I have the Wolfman .61, .74 and .94 in the WR1 head I had the Karve D,E & F plate I would say the 74 Wolfman shaved very close to the E plate and the F was not as efficient as the 86 which I sold to a friend. I think if you really like the feel of the Karve C plate I would go with a Wolfman WR1 .74 or WR2 .98 which I got to try thanks to LOOT


Thanks for the info really appreciate it. I also have the Karve D & E plate which are slightly harsh in blade feel but I can get very good shave but I have to be carful with the pressure. It certainly sounds deceiving. I will definitely will go with the .74 when I get the chance. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the .61 OC and the Karve F. The Karve is more efficient, but the Wolfman has more blade feel. The efficiency is very similar if I add a shim to the Wolfman.

(12-01-2018, 06:09 AM)ShyGuyx Wrote:
(12-01-2018, 03:45 AM)Shavemd Wrote:
(11-30-2018, 09:55 PM)ShyGuyx Wrote: I have a question if someone can help. I own a Wolfman .67 SB SS but I want to up the efficiency and I’m thinking of purchasing the .86 gap when I get a chance. Also I want to experience a bit more blade feel. I also own a karve razor the C plate which is a  .85 gap a shy of the Wolfman .86. By looking at both razors the head geometry looks quite similar. The Karve C is perfect for me in terms of efficiency and blade, would you say the Wolfman .86 feels the same at Karve C plate?

This would help me massively if someone has experience both with razor/gaps. It’s not easy to purchase a Wolfman directly. I just want to make the right decision when I gets the chance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Karve gap is slightly deceiving as far as blade feel because the blade is slightly recessed. I have the Wolfman .61, .74 and .94 in the WR1 head I had the Karve D,E & F plate I would say the 74 Wolfman shaved very close to the E plate and the F was not as efficient as the 86 which I sold to a friend. I think if you really like the feel of the Karve C plate I would go with a Wolfman WR1 .74 or WR2 .98 which I got to try thanks to LOOT


Thanks for the info really appreciate it. I also have the Karve D & E plate which are slightly harsh in blade feel but I can get very good shave but I have to be carful with the pressure. It certainly sounds deceiving. I will definitely will go with the .74 when I get the chance. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the .61 OC and the Karve F. The Karve is more efficient, but the Wolfman has more blade feel. The efficiency is very similar if I add a shim to the Wolfman.
#32
(12-01-2018, 07:36 PM)Dayman Wrote:
(12-01-2018, 06:09 AM)ShyGuyx Wrote:
(12-01-2018, 03:45 AM)Shavemd Wrote: The Karve gap is slightly deceiving as far as blade feel because the blade is slightly recessed. I have the Wolfman .61, .74 and .94 in the WR1 head I had the Karve D,E & F plate I would say the 74 Wolfman shaved very close to the E plate and the F was not as efficient as the 86 which I sold to a friend. I think if you really like the feel of the Karve C plate I would go with a Wolfman WR1 .74 or WR2 .98 which I got to try thanks to LOOT


Thanks for the info really appreciate it. I also have the Karve D & E plate which are slightly harsh in blade feel but I can get very good shave but I have to be carful with the pressure. It certainly sounds deceiving. I will definitely will go with the .74 when I get the chance. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the .61 OC and the Karve F. The Karve is more efficient, but the Wolfman has more blade feel. The efficiency is very similar if I add a shim to the Wolfman.

(12-01-2018, 06:09 AM)ShyGuyx Wrote:
(12-01-2018, 03:45 AM)Shavemd Wrote: The Karve gap is slightly deceiving as far as blade feel because the blade is slightly recessed. I have the Wolfman .61, .74 and .94 in the WR1 head I had the Karve D,E & F plate I would say the 74 Wolfman shaved very close to the E plate and the F was not as efficient as the 86 which I sold to a friend. I think if you really like the feel of the Karve C plate I would go with a Wolfman WR1 .74 or WR2 .98 which I got to try thanks to LOOT


Thanks for the info really appreciate it. I also have the Karve D & E plate which are slightly harsh in blade feel but I can get very good shave but I have to be carful with the pressure. It certainly sounds deceiving. I will definitely will go with the .74 when I get the chance. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have the .61 OC and the Karve F. The Karve is more efficient, but the Wolfman has more blade feel. The efficiency is very similar if I add a shim to the Wolfman.


Thanks for the info.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#33
I have some interest in buying a Timeless but the options are confusing. I didn't hear a lot of talk in this thread about the brass version which apparently is equally as good and is an updated design (or so some say). I just can't begin to guess as to which one would work best for me. I wish I could pay a rental fee and try a set of three plates to figure it out.
#34

Golf Nut
San Antonio, Texas
(12-02-2018, 03:01 AM)Asafiev Wrote: I have some interest in buying a Timeless but the options are confusing.  I didn't hear a lot of talk in this thread about the brass version which apparently is equally as good and is an updated design (or so some say).  I just can't begin to guess as to which one would work best for me.  I wish I could pay a rental fee and try a set of three plates to figure it out.

I know your feeling. But luckily, they do offer a 30 day return policy and I know many folks buy a 68 and a 95 baseplate to see which they prefer and return the one they dont like, for a refunds less $10 return fee (which isnt bad at all)
#35
[/quote]

I know your feeling.  But luckily, they do offer a 30 day return policy and I know many folks buy a 68 and a 95 baseplate to see which they prefer and return the one they dont like, for a refunds less $10 return fee (which isnt bad at all)
[/quote]

I may end up doing precisely that... I still wonder how the brass version plays into all of this (two levels of aggression are now available).

herbert7890 likes this post
#36
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2018, 04:21 AM by EFDan.)
The .38mm blade gap on the brass left me wondering. No experience with it though. That was the last I read about it and maybe they have more aggressive plates now.

herbert7890, LOOT and Asafiev like this post
#37

Golf Nut
San Antonio, Texas
Update: I was able to buy a used Wolfman 61 SB Head only, and in due time after using them, I will be able to compare with the Timeless (probably closer to the 68 rather than 95). it's not exactly the gap I wanted but it will get me to try Wolfman and I could try trading if it's too mild. Looks like December will be an amazing Months for shaving : )

Marcos, EFDan and Blade4vor like this post
#38
(12-02-2018, 02:39 PM)herbert7890 Wrote: Update: I was able to buy a used Wolfman 61 SB Head only,  and in due time after using them, I will be able to compare with the Timeless (probably closer to the 68 rather than 95).   it's not exactly the gap I wanted but it will get me to try Wolfman and I could try trading if it's too mild.  Looks like December will be an amazing Months for shaving : )
I’m looking forward to your thoughts. I’ve been thinking about getting a Timeless head and I’m not sure if I want the .68 OC or one of the .95 heads. I have a Wolfman OC in the .61 gap and I’m curious how they compare. I’m also curious how the .95 compares to the Karve F plate.

herbert7890 likes this post
#39

Golf Nut
San Antonio, Texas
(12-02-2018, 03:19 PM)Dayman Wrote:
(12-02-2018, 02:39 PM)herbert7890 Wrote: Update: I was able to buy a used Wolfman 61 SB Head only,  and in due time after using them, I will be able to compare with the Timeless (probably closer to the 68 rather than 95).   it's not exactly the gap I wanted but it will get me to try Wolfman and I could try trading if it's too mild.  Looks like December will be an amazing Months for shaving : )
I’m looking forward to your thoughts. I’ve been thinking about getting a Timeless head and I’m not sure if I want the .68 OC or one of the .95 heads. I have a Wolfman OC in the .61 gap and I’m curious how they compare. I’m also curious how the .95 compares to the Karve F plate.

I will definitely do that comparison with both the Timeless 68 and 95. But I must say, it will be a hard time for the Wolfman to beat my new gold standard, the timeless 95. But I hope I'm surprised!
#40

Golf Nut
San Antonio, Texas
Birthday Shave of the day with the 68 OC (first try)

Razor: Timeless 68 OC with Scalloped Cap
Soap and Aftershave: The Club Project C (SFWS)
Brush: Leo Frilot's SFWS 2018 Brush
Fragrance: Roja Creation E (Enigma) Parfum Extrait
Bowl: Timeless Lather Bowl
[Image: 1rH2SDH.jpg]

gregcss, Marcos, TheHunter and 3 others like this post


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)