From what I can remember this question came up a year or so ago on another forum and someone messaged Matt and his response was only that the razor had positive exposure and any wouldn't release any kind of # associated with it. He was very polite about it but just didn't release any info on it other than that. I don't think it had anything to do with trade secrets or the like but just that it wasn't something that he advertised at all. If a competitor really wanted to know what it was, its not that difficult to measure if you have the right equipment.
(03-05-2020, 01:58 PM)muzichead Wrote: If a competitor really wanted to know what it was, its not that difficult to measure if you have the right equipment.
That’s what I thought as well....
But I agree, it’s their right as a manufacturer/ company to release as much or as little info about the razors’ specs as they want.
I was just curious, as I really like it, and was impressed by how smooth it feels, considering the efficiency and the blade gap....
(03-08-2020, 10:26 AM)Edmond_Dantes Wrote: i have the ti of this razor the .95 and .68. i used the 95 once and i cut my neck pretty good. so i stopped using it. the 68 on the other hand is a awsome razor and it gives me good shaves. still trying out blades. for a while i only used murkur blades
Great to hear .68 works well for you.
Before I purchased it a few months ago, I was afraid that .95 Ti Timeless might be too aggressive for me, especially as a daily shaver.... it’s very efficient, but also surprisingly smooth and comfortable, which is why I was wondering about the blade exposure on it...
Need to remember not to get fooled by the lighter weight and apply too much pressure, and it’s a great shave!
But, as always, YMMV and all that....
Users browsing this thread: