#331
(05-05-2020, 05:56 PM)fhalden Wrote:
(05-05-2020, 05:44 PM)IanG153 Wrote:
(05-04-2020, 08:36 AM)fhalden Wrote: I'm looking at several, but the current front-runner is a Shavemac 2 band Silvertip. Although I don't really match brushes to razors, I match them to soaps or whether I'm bowl or face lathering.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

I'm interested in your matching - what do you focus on to match brushes to bowl or face lathering? Thanks!
I use a boar brush to lather a hard soap, and bowl lather it. I use a badger for croaps and creams - a soft one for face lathering, and a stiff one for bowl lathering. If I face lather every day, I can get irritation, so I don't mush and scrub with my brush. Mostly painting strokes, and mild splaying with back and forth agitation. The boar is my stiffest brush, so I load off the puck, then move to the bowl, and finally paint on my face.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Thanks for taking the time to write that - I'll start experimenting!

fhalden likes this post
#332

Member
Indiana
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2020, 05:57 PM by CK89.)
This DB is really very smooth. I just need a bit more efficiency.
Paradigm Shaveware Is it possible to have Javelin or DB with higher gap options? I think the original gap is 0.8,
I think would be nice to have maybe 0.9 or 1.0mm.

The original plate is very efficient, but could be nice to have a super efficient Paradigm Razor like Wolfman WR2 1.55.

shaveSymptomatic, LOOT, keto and 2 others like this post
#333

Member
Florida
I agree with Cem about a paradigm razor with hyper efficiency like the 1.55 WR2 Smile

Andy please make it happen with the Javelin

Darktrader, Deus Vult, CK89 and 2 others like this post
#334

Member
Wyoming
I am not sure if gap or exposure (or safety bar design etc.) is the best way to get added efficiency. I think I might have added a little blade exposure when giving my 2019 the mirror finish. I think it was mainly from thinning the top cap a little if I did if I did anything. Either way, I like it before and after. I would vote for exposure over gap, but I don't design razors.

I agree the blade is really well behaved (very smooth with the flex being well managed) to the point it could be made more efficient without losing much smoothness. . . .but I think it shaves really close the way it is (and I historically love aggressive razors). The smoothness (and gap) fooled me for a while, I thought the razor was too mild by mistake, and didn't give it enough love at first. I didn't use it enough thinking it was too mild to realize how close it really did shave.

If Andrew does amp it up, I for one hope he does it his way. He certainly has me impressed.

AJSharp, AQU, CK89 and 1 others like this post
#335

Member
Indiana
I prefer gap increase more. Since for a same head design, more gaps will have more exposure and more efficiency.
Also, with more gap, I think smoothness not reducing noticeably. This is what I was experienced with Wolfman WR2 and Carbon.

shaveSymptomatic and Darktrader like this post
#336

Member
Florida
(05-07-2020, 09:01 PM)CK89 Wrote: I prefer gap increase more. Since for a same head design, more gaps will have more exposure and more efficiency.
Also, with more gap, I think smoothness not reducing noticeably. This is what I was experienced with Wolfman WR2 and Carbon.
Which Carbon base plate do you have?  

I agree about the 1.55 wr2! Ratio of efficiency/smoothness couldn't be better. At least not yet!
#337

Member
Indiana
(05-07-2020, 09:21 PM)shaveSymptomatic Wrote:
(05-07-2020, 09:01 PM)CK89 Wrote: I prefer gap increase more. Since for a same head design, more gaps will have more exposure and more efficiency.
Also, with more gap, I think smoothness not reducing noticeably. This is what I was experienced with Wolfman WR2 and Carbon.
Which Carbon base plate do you have?  

I agree about the 1.55 wr2! Ratio of efficiency/smoothness couldn't be better. At least not yet!
 
"++" I used in pass around has 1.08 mm gap.

shaveSymptomatic likes this post
#338
(05-07-2020, 05:38 PM)CK89 Wrote: This DB is really very smooth. I just need a bit more efficiency.
Paradigm Shaveware Is it possible to have Javelin or DB with higher gap options? I think the original gap is 0.8,
I think would be nice to have maybe 0.9 or 1.0mm.

The original plate is very efficient, but could be nice to have a super efficient Paradigm Razor like Wolfman WR2 1.55.

(05-07-2020, 08:13 PM)shaveSymptomatic Wrote: I agree with Cem about a paradigm razor with hyper efficiency like the 1.55 WR2 Smile

Andy please make it happen with the Javelin


Best posts I've read in a long time. Placate the masochists!

shaveSymptomatic, CK89, IanG153 and 2 others like this post
#339
From my experience with the aluminum Javelin I think the Ti Javelin will give you the greater efficiency you are asking for. Me, personally, I’m very happy with what I am getting from the Diamondback. But I know you extreme masochists ( HaHa) have to have that Chef’s knife to shave with.

IanG153, Deus Vult, keto and 6 others like this post
#340

Member
Indiana
(05-07-2020, 09:39 PM)Shavemd Wrote: But I know you extreme masochists ( HaHa) have to have that Chef’s knife to shave with.

I remember he was shimming WR2 1.55. Tongue

IanG153, LOOT, Dragonsbeard and 1 others like this post


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)