(05-29-2017, 02:06 AM)jmudrick Wrote: (05-29-2017, 12:16 AM)SharpSpine Wrote: (05-28-2017, 11:32 PM)Freddy Wrote: There seems to be so much drama surrounding this razor from supposedly cornering the market on the Feather blades to having to modify a GEM blade in order to have an alternative to the Feathers to whether or not nipping a GEM blade is necessary (though I would trust SharpSpine's assertion that it is not needed) to quality control to price (though the CORE certainly mitigates that factor) to customer service that while the price of the CORE is good, everything else gives me pause.
Thanks Freddy. I don't think there is any dispute about a GEM blade working in a v1 OneBlade without cutting it down. I simply don't know about the v2 & thus this CORE razor regarding the GEM. For $50 I'm willing to satisfy my curiosity. I just wasn't going to spend $400 for a v2 to test. Sadly I had a couple people let me down when they said they would test the GEM in the v2 but then didn't.
Maybe you missed this post some time back
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
If you look further you'll see that I even replied to that gentleman. While I was excited to hear his feedback, it was still a single case from someone I wasn't familiar with. Regardless, I'm finally going to get a chance to see for myself without dropping $400. I'm happy about that.
Freddy and
jmudrick like this post
>>> Brian <<<
Happy beeps, buddy! Happy beeps!