(04-12-2021, 12:45 PM)sgarnett Wrote: The Dart is odd. Some say it is very mild. Some say it is too aggressive. My take is that it was a design mistake - the rounded corner is cool, but it gets a little too close to the corner of the blade. Doesn’t matter on a flattish or convex area like cheek or jaw, but it can be treacherous in the hollows on the neck such as under the jaw, especially if the grain direction is inconvenient. A razor that is (for me) too mild but still requires the care of an aggressive razor just isn’t very useful. Personally, I think tweaking the corner radius a bit or reducing the gap in the corners (give the SB a wry smile) could make the Dart a winner as a mild razor.
Only intended as constructive criticism - the Blackbird and Vector are my favorite razors, but the Dart missed its target IMHO.
Couldn't disagree with you anymore in the Dart's intended market & purpose. High quality construction? Check. An affordable sub $100 razor from a quality alloy that mostly everyone can afford? Check. An every day shaver that is both mild & efficient? Check.
Many love it and many dislke it just the same. I believe the only real flaw that exists between the razor & user, is the user himself. Every razor has its own design characteristics from what the manufacturer believes will be a successful product through means of R&D and prototype testing with a diverse group of shavers. Once done, design adjustments or implementations are assessed and we get to the final test and production run out.
Every razor produced has a learning curve. Some are easier than others to grasp while some require a bit more persistence to master. The razor is static and will always be a constant because its purpose is just to hold the blade as the manufacturer's design intended. The adjustment or lack thereof comes from the user quite frankly. Most have a perceived notion/belief that their shave acumen is infallible and that their experience/technique has honed their shaving skills to perfection or close near too. Thus giving those a colorful and perceived shave enlightenment but, is more so an askewed view of what's done properly vs what is not.
I know it's a matter of opinion on your behalf and that is fine as you are entitled to your own beliefs, that's what forums are for. I would have given your opinion more credibility and weight if you would have stated that the razor is flawed for you. But, your statement covers a broader range and captures the whole belief that it was designed poorly for everyone. Data & Numbers are of immeasurable value when making a statement of that magnitude and even though it's just your opinion, you encompass all shavers including the manufacturer themselves as owning and producing a tool that is poorly designed. You bring nothing to support that opinionated claim. And then the icing on the cake with a rather conflicting statement of "the Blackbird & Vector are my favorite razors". What? Glorify a product(s) and simultaneously crap on another from the same house? I know we have fickle shavers in this hobby of ours and look not to defend any particular group of those shavers nor the manufacturer as well. Blackland & those shavers can defend themselves adequately enough. I just personally find your statement a bit perplexing and misleading.
Derhey and
ischiapp like this post