Two things on the site to note... Improvements and polish.
- An all-new super search... Drill down and find anything! https://dailylather.com/search
- A new scoring system w/16 metrics! https://dailylather.com/content/sotd-may-4-2017
What do y'all think?
- An all-new super search... Drill down and find anything! https://dailylather.com/search
- A new scoring system w/16 metrics! https://dailylather.com/content/sotd-may-4-2017
What do y'all think?
Both seem like great new features. The scoring system took just a moment to get used to, but I think it’s quite clever. I like how you are able to get so many metrics into a relatively small space. (Seeing them separately would make it all seem much heavier to take in.)
Whenever I go to shave, I assume there’s someone else on the planet shaving, so I say “I’m gonna go shave, too.”
– Mitch Hedberg
– Mitch Hedberg
(05-07-2017, 06:49 PM)Matsilainen Wrote: Both seem like great new features. The scoring system took just a moment to get used to, but I think it’s quite clever. I like how you are able to get so many metrics into a relatively small space. (Seeing them separately would make it all seem much heavier to take in.)
Thanks! Yeah, I didn't want to make a huge chart or one that was hard to understand. This seemed like the most logical way to do it...
To explain the new features, check out the Site Improvements at Daily Lather! post.
Hopefully the explanation(s) are clear... I'm open to feedback and questions, of course.
Hopefully the explanation(s) are clear... I'm open to feedback and questions, of course.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 09:32 PM by andrewjs18.)
why no https?!
aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2. google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.
aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2. google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 11:29 PM by BoarderPhreak.)
(05-19-2017, 07:01 PM)andrewjs18 Wrote: why no https?!
aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2. google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.
Huh? I've been using HTTPS and HTTP/2 for two months now.
(This post was last modified: 05-20-2017, 06:25 AM by andrewjs18.)
(05-19-2017, 11:28 PM)BoarderPhreak Wrote:(05-19-2017, 07:01 PM)andrewjs18 Wrote: why no https?!
aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2. google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.
Huh? I've been using HTTPS and HTTP/2 for two months now.
it definitely was not serving the site over https when I made the comment. are you using hsts?
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
Users browsing this thread: