#81

Member
Nashville, TN
I'm impressed with your site. I especially like the news and company sections and look forward to more posts in those areas.

BoarderPhreak likes this post
#82
(04-26-2017, 05:56 PM)Pete123 Wrote: I'm impressed with your site. I especially like the news and company sections and look forward to more posts in those areas.

Thanks so much, Pete! Really appreciate the kind words. Hope you and others find the site useful and fun! Smile
#83
Two things on the site to note... Improvements and polish. Smile

- An all-new super search... Drill down and find anything! https://dailylather.com/search
- A new scoring system w/16 metrics! https://dailylather.com/content/sotd-may-4-2017

What do y'all think?

whollykaw and Matsilainen like this post
#84

Member
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Both seem like great new features. The scoring system took just a moment to get used to, but I think it’s quite clever. I like how you are able to get so many metrics into a relatively small space. (Seeing them separately would make it all seem much heavier to take in.)

BoarderPhreak likes this post
Whenever I go to shave, I assume there’s someone else on the planet shaving, so I say “I’m gonna go shave, too.”
– Mitch Hedberg
#85
(05-07-2017, 06:49 PM)Matsilainen Wrote: Both seem like great new features. The scoring system took just a moment to get used to, but I think it’s quite clever. I like how you are able to get so many metrics into a relatively small space. (Seeing them separately would make it all seem much heavier to take in.)

Thanks! Yeah, I didn't want to make a huge chart or one that was hard to understand. This seemed like the most logical way to do it...

Matsilainen likes this post
#86
To explain the new features, check out the Site Improvements at Daily Lather! post.

Hopefully the explanation(s) are clear... I'm open to feedback and questions, of course.
#87
I made a few adjustments to the metrics to better reflect qualities I wish to express, reduce redundancy and improve clarity. Basically they make a little more sense now.

Matsilainen likes this post
#88

Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 09:32 PM by andrewjs18.)
why no https?!

aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2. google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.

Rebus Knebus and Freddy like this post
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
#89
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 11:29 PM by BoarderPhreak.)
(05-19-2017, 07:01 PM)andrewjs18 Wrote: why no https?!

aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2. google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.

Huh? I've been using HTTPS and HTTP/2 for two months now.
#90

Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
(This post was last modified: 05-20-2017, 06:25 AM by andrewjs18.)
(05-19-2017, 11:28 PM)BoarderPhreak Wrote:
(05-19-2017, 07:01 PM)andrewjs18 Wrote: why no https?!

aside from the security side of things (you are handling user data), there's also performance benefits...one of those is the ability to use HTTP/2.  google also ranks sites higher that use HTTPS than those that don't.

Huh?  I've been using HTTPS and HTTP/2 for two months now.

it definitely was not serving the site over https when I made the comment. are you using hsts?
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)