#1
When I first looked into shaving soaps, I asked, which one was the best and became quickly disillusioned. Over and over again I was given recommendations only to find these recommendations lacking in some way ranging from scent to performance. Products proclaimed to be superb, I found to be “average”. It was noted to me that many people have not tried some of the more expensive offerings so they cannot comment. And then I found I found Santa Maria Novella, the Bugatti of soaps.  In a way, I was prepared to be disappointed again. I was not.

While not cheap, it’s also not as expensive as ADP or ABC, its Italian supercar brethren. But IMO, and at least from getting recommendations of many others, SMN is the Platinum Standard by which all others are judged.  IMO, this isn’t the bronze, nor silver, nor gold – but the best of the best, the Bugatti of the shaving world. At an expensive per unit cost, this is not for the faint at heart.  But is it a work horse? Maybe it is. Maybe not.  Only the cost/shave will finally decide that.

As par for the course, reviews of SMN are far and few between.  Inevitably when discussed in forums, naysayers would proclaim SMN nothing more than an expensive version of Proraso and seem to believe that story despite the ingredients being different. Not even close. In comparison, Proraso is so pedestrian it’s like comparing that Bugatti to … well a walking pedestrian.

There is little I can complain about from the sublime scent, the touch of menthol, the bit of tobacco or the technical attributes – the way it explodes in lather, its lather feel, glide, and cushion. Naysayers also like to proclaim there is no way its performance is four or six times as good as say Proraso, but the same naysayers don’t seem to understand the Law of Diminishing Returns.  

SMN is the complete package for me, a summer soap. I imagine it’s like driving a Bugatti Veyron on the Autobahn into the Italian Alps waving good bye to the Ferraris. But my real question is if it’s a summer work horse or not.  I haven’t got enough uses done to judge but my initial judgment is “maybe”, at a slightly higher cost than MdC.

If you have never tried SMN and like a touch of menthol, you owe it to your self to try it. Its per unit cost might be difficult to get over, except you do get a whopping 7.4 fl oz of product, something nahsayers also tend to ignore.

Forget the Ferrari for a moment – try a Bugatti, you might like it.

Arun, Aurelian28, scottb7862 and 3 others like this post
#2

Restitutor Orbis
I think this is near impossible to get for non-conus guys like me except from the occasional BST. Heard good things about it though. Thanks for the review grim.
#3
(08-10-2016, 10:11 PM)Aurelian28 Wrote: I think this is near impossible to get for non-conus guys like me except from the occasional BST. Heard good things about it though. Thanks for the review grim.


http://www.santamarianovellausa.com looks like US only, If you can translate Italian, maybe there real website in Italy http://www.smnovella.com

Aurelian28 likes this post
#4
Hi grim ,

Just curious is this what RazorRock's Santa Maria del Fiore Sapone da Barba is trying to replicate.  If so, have you tried it and how did it compare.  Never tried either but was thinking of giving the RR a try sometime if he keeps getting it.  Thanks.
Go Blue!
#5
(This post was last modified: 08-11-2016, 08:56 PM by grim.)
(08-11-2016, 08:00 PM)Wolverine Wrote: Hi grim ,

Just curious is this what RazorRock's Santa Maria del Fiore Sapone da Barba is trying to replicate.  If so, have you tried it and how did it compare.  Never tried either but was thinking of giving the RR a try sometime if he keeps getting it.  Thanks.

No sorry, I have not tried that specific Razor Rock. I have tried a slew of other ones though (e.g., XXX, Lavender, Stallion, Freedberg, etc.) and they are IMO not remotely belonging in the same sentence although RazoRock soaps explode in lather, they are just not the same thing that I can see.
#6
(This post was last modified: 08-15-2016, 02:00 AM by scottb7862.)
The only thing I dislike about SMN is the jar it comes in... same thing we XPEC.. I've transferred both creams to a tin, much easier for me to load this way...
So far this summer it HAS been a workhorse!! I transferred probably half of the jar to a tin and I'd say there is probably a quarter of that left, and I use it 5 out of 7 shaves..I also love it for winter, has a great clean crisp scent, for me a great wake up soap, I'm not a morning person!!
Haven't found anything better... The razorock, it's mostly just Tuscan Tobacco scented, no menthol and is a very good soap....but it's not SMN, a great soap, not even close..

TommyCarioca, DeLuxeShaving and grim like this post
#7
(08-15-2016, 01:59 AM)scottb7862 Wrote: The only thing I dislike about SMN is the jar it comes in... same thing we XPEC

There are several soaps I think of as elite or first class and think the container they come in leave much to be desired. OTH, I also hate the fancy "crocks" some come in as a waste of money. I am paying for the consumable product, not some fancy container that ends up in the trash (or clutter). There needs to be a balance and yup, SMN' container could be improved. Thankfully, I don't care about containers!
#8

Member
Connecticut
(08-10-2016, 03:39 PM)grim Wrote: As par for the course, reviews of SMN are far and few between.  Inevitably when discussed in forums, naysayers would proclaim SMN nothing more than an expensive version of Proraso and seem to believe that story despite the ingredients being different. Not even close. In comparison, Proraso is so pedestrian it’s like comparing that Bugatti to … well a walking pedestrian.

If memory serves me correctly the comparisons between Proraso Green and SMN were directed to the original Eucalyptus scented formula not the Tobacco Tuscano formula, at least I haven't seen anyone comparing the latest formulation to Proraso. I have not examined the ingredients list of either soap but I still have a tub of both original SMN and Proraso green and I can understand and agree with the comparison in texture, scent and performance. However I do think original SMN has better post shave than Proraso. In my opinion the latest version of SMN is the best of all versions by a wide margin and is nothing like Proraso.

CHSeifert and TommyCarioca like this post
Nathan
#9
(08-16-2016, 11:53 PM)Merkur Man Wrote:
(08-10-2016, 03:39 PM)grim Wrote: As par for the course, reviews of SMN are far and few between.  Inevitably when discussed in forums, naysayers would proclaim SMN nothing more than an expensive version of Proraso and seem to believe that story despite the ingredients being different. Not even close. In comparison, Proraso is so pedestrian it’s like comparing that Bugatti to … well a walking pedestrian.

If memory serves me correctly the comparisons between Proraso Green and SMN were directed to the original Eucalyptus scented formula not the Tobacco Tuscano formula, at least I haven't seen anyone comparing the latest formulation to Proraso. I have not examined the ingredients list of either soap but I still have a tub of both original SMN and Proraso green and I can understand and agree with the comparison in texture, scent and performance. However I do think original SMN has better post shave than Proraso. In my opinion the latest version of SMN is the best of all versions by a wide margin and is nothing like Proraso.


Agreed.
It's SMN V1, that is a very close cousin to Proraso green. I own them. But I also feel the SMN v1 is an overall better shaving product.
Cheers, Claus from Denmark
#10
In my opinion the best shaving soap along with I Coloniali Mango and Nuavia blu


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)