Still busy with the
KEPKINH Pure Vetiver.
https://i.imgur.com/d73OjYU.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8aZibEC.jpg
Sincerely it hit me nicely.
I didn't expect to have to make
several attempts to confirm the Martin de Candre.
The results are close, regarding the quality of the lather.
Magnificent in both cases, with strong mechanical qualities.
So I looked for the differences in more subtle details.
Consequently, even more subjective.
I think
fragrance is the factor that most differentiates these two soaps.
French is sunny, fresh, herbaceous and therefore easier.
Greek is more faithful to the original, with deeper tones.
But without those muddy and dark notes of many.
For me, it's the better of the two.
Another detail is the
yield.
Incredibly, Greek isn't blown away on the first fight.
It certainly does not come close to the fantastic feature of the French.
But it is certainly not a little resistant product.
Also thanks to the wax in the formulation.
http://ilrasoio.com/viewtopic.php?p=339019#p339019
Finally,
ease.
Here the differences are all seen.
Where French is practically instantaneous, Greek requires much more effort.
Both in the amount of water (the higher the water point, but not thirsty!).
Especially in mechanical work, greatly facilitated by a good synthetic.
So in conclusion, in the general economy the King is firmly in command.
But in the days the Kερκινη V3 has proved to be quite good also from the point of view of the conditioning of the skin.
In a slow and not particularly effective way, in fact I always had to add an aftershave accessory to control dermatitis.
But in any case I perceived an improvement, such as to consider this detail ... which I gave for almost nothing.
Personally if I had to choose only one of the two, I would take the KEPKINH.
In fact, the MdC on my skin has truly zero conditioning effectiveness.
And I find the scent excellent, but less natural.
Kicker. Suspenseful music. Long shot. Fade.