#1

expert shaver
Panther's Stanley Cup Champs
Just got an email from Timeless pertaining to their new slim head titanium and stainless steel razor heads. According to Timeless this is their most aggressive razor and easier to shave under the nose. Price for a titanium razor (without stand) is under $300 which to me is a bargain compared to Haircut and Shave. So now we have at least two companies selling titanium razors for $300 and under (Timeless and Blackland).

jags009, Petronius, JimmyH and 7 others like this post
#2
Very excited for this. Always loved Timeless products, just usually a little too bulky for me.

ALI, Tester28, JoeLr and 2 others like this post
#3

Member
Redwood City
Woah. My prayers have been answered. Where can I find more info about this? Photos?!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#4

expert shaver
Panther's Stanley Cup Champs
(11-18-2020, 04:30 PM)drdeemanda Wrote: Woah. My prayers have been answered. Where can I find more info about this? Photos?!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://timelessrazor.com/shop
#5
Says that it’s a .5 gap. Do they mean 1.05 compared to the .95?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#6
Looks like .50mm gap, 0.05mm exposure from the description.

AlanH81 and Fedsbackhand like this post
Tony
#7
(This post was last modified: 11-18-2020, 05:38 PM by DSR.)
(11-18-2020, 05:13 PM)george1906 Wrote: Says that it’s a .5 gap.  Do they mean 1.05 compared to the .95?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was wondering the same...
The quoted blade exposure seems the same as on the .95 razor, but they say this new slim baseplate is “AGGRESSIVE”, with “a lot of blade feel”... so was wondering about the 0.5 mm gap...
#8
Think it is .5 unless they messed up the baseplate

[Image: XKW99pT.png]

I'd rather have the bronze head in titanium actually. Or even SS.
#9
(11-18-2020, 05:37 PM)DSR Wrote:
(11-18-2020, 05:13 PM)george1906 Wrote: Says that it’s a .5 gap.  Do they mean 1.05 compared to the .95?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was wondering the same...
The quoted blade exposure seems the same as on the .95 razor, but they say this new slim baseplate is “AGGRESSIVE”, with “a lot of blade feel”... so was wondering about the 0.5 mm gap...


I am assuming that they did not make any changes to the top cap so by slimming down the base plate, it must make the gap larger and make the blade exposure larger. Just my thoughts. May need to contact them to understand it more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Matsilainen likes this post
#10
(This post was last modified: 11-18-2020, 05:53 PM by Fedsbackhand.)
Hard to tell just how much "weight" or height they took off the original with the pictures.

What was the exposure of the original? 
Okay looked it up. Original .95 is the same as the slim, 0.05 exposure. The .68 is neutral.


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)