#2

Member
Ferndale, MI
Screw PETA.

Floyd Eye, Rebus Knebus, jcmy53 and 1 others like this post
- Jeff
#3

Member
Ferndale, MI
And P&G while we're at it...

Tidepool, Tbone, Hobbyist and 2 others like this post
- Jeff
#4
(This post was last modified: 09-21-2018, 11:30 PM by Teiste.)
(09-21-2018, 02:50 AM)wyze0ne Wrote: And P&G while we're at it...

Yes , theyre not really concern about badgers but profits.Now they have the perfect excuse to stop selling badger brushes , sell synthetics and get bigger profits. Theyre not lowering the prices but keep the actual ones and , there you go , more money to make.Muhle US sells the 25 mm STF brush for 131 dollars.AoS would sell it for 190 , the current price for their silvertips.

Meanwhile in China badgers would be still killed.

Hobbyist, wyze0ne, Matsilainen and 1 others like this post
#5

Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
I think synthetic hair is at a point right now that animal hair in shaving brushes is irrelevant for a lot of people. I've used a badger brush maybe once in the past year.

Eleven, Teiste, Mickey ObermanSfZ2h8UM and 3 others like this post
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
#6

Member
Ferndale, MI
(09-22-2018, 12:41 AM)andrewjs18 Wrote: I think synthetic hair is at a point right now that animal hair in shaving brushes is irrelevant for a lot of people. I've used a badger brush maybe once in the past year.

See, I've gone the opposite direction. I was all aboard the synthetic train for awhile until I got curious about a higher end badger and picked up an Elite Manchurian. It's been my main brush ever since. It just feels "nicer" on the face. I can't really explain how, but when I use a synthetic now, it just feels cheap or fake somehow. They still produce excellent lather with ease and I still use them sometimes. I just prefer the face feel of the badger.

Avgusto, GSVwetshave, Matsilainen and 2 others like this post
- Jeff
#7

Merchant
St. Louis, MO
If it lathers the soap, the typical AOS customer won’t care that it’s synthetic.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Matsilainen, Teiste and Freddy like this post
Shave Sharp, Look Sharp
#8
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2018, 03:23 AM by Standard.)
Great companies risk significant loss to the bottom line and shareholder value to champion humane treatment of animals in China.

While not mentioned on the P&G website, guessing AoS badger brushes made a significant contribution to company earnings.

Teiste and Matsilainen like this post
#9
(09-22-2018, 02:47 AM)wyze0ne Wrote:
(09-22-2018, 12:41 AM)andrewjs18 Wrote: I think synthetic hair is at a point right now that animal hair in shaving brushes is irrelevant for a lot of people.  I've used a badger brush maybe once in the past year.

See, I've gone the opposite direction. I was all aboard the synthetic train for awhile until I got curious about a higher end badger and picked up an Elite Manchurian. It's been my main brush ever since. It just feels "nicer" on the face. I can't really explain how, but when I use a synthetic now, it just feels cheap or fake somehow. They still produce excellent lather with ease and I still use them sometimes. I just prefer the face feel of the badger.

I have been reading great reviews of those Elite brushes , specially the two band ones.Seems they’re as good as the old Rooney Heritage two band , which were nothing less than superb.

May I ask you if you have tried a Chubby 2 synthetic ?

Matsilainen likes this post
#10
(09-22-2018, 12:41 AM)andrewjs18 Wrote: I think synthetic hair is at a point right now that animal hair in shaving brushes is irrelevant for a lot of people.  I've used a badger brush maybe once in the past year.

The same here.

However I don’t think this would help to develop new synthetic fibers , to be honest.P&G would sell whatever is on the market , overpriced , of course.

Matsilainen and Tbone like this post


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)