Used the Magnolia this morning.
While I really enjoy tallow soaps (used the Aether yesterday), and Mohammad's first offering of his duck tallow soap did not disappoint-I am an unabashed fan of lighter, non-tallow soaps, especially the Italian soaps like SMN, XPEC, Nuàvia, Saponificio Varesio, which are in the topmost tier for me.
The performance of this new formulation Grooming Dept soap was just outstanding.
I have never seen a glossier lather with a non-tallow soap. It's shinier than most of the tallow soaps I have. And yet, although the lather was very stable, it did not feel thick, dense, or heavy. Super easy to lather as well-I used a big synthetic this morning, a 30mm Tuxedo knot from AP Shaving.
Great glide, and a wonderful post-shave feel to this soap as well. It has all of the things I really enjoy about a tallow soap without the heaviness, and a nice 'lightness' and glide to it like the best non-tallow soaps I have.
Now about the scents. My tastes in scents are basic and pedestrian. I like a good scent, but if performance on a soap is 10 on the importance scale, scent is a 5 for me.
The Magnolia is very pleasant, I can smell magnolia, perhaps some gardenia, perhaps some woody notes. And I can also pick up something of the scent of the underlying ingredients. I had the same experience with the Aether yesterday.
Here's my theory.
This stems from a conversation I had with
Matsilainen who commented that one popular soap maker's soaps smelled alike in a certain way.
I think it has to do with not wanting to compromise on the base ingredients.
ram57 mentioned that he smelled carnauba wax. My nose isn't that keen, but I know what he means. There's an underlying scent of the waxes, butters, etc. And I recognize this on all of the new formulation soaps that I got from Grooming Dept, at least from the tub.
It's by no means unpleasant. But it's there, underneath the fragrance notes. I grabbed some of my soaps from that other popular soap maker, who also uses very good quality ingredients, and I could recognize that 'sameness' that
Matsilainen was talking about.
It's like organic shampoo. I have one that does a great job on my hair, makes it feel great, nice shine, etc., etc. But unlike these soaps where the scent of the ingredients is not unpleasant, there's some ingredient in there that I can hardly bear.
The modern mass-produced shampoos use lesser-quality, less-natural ingredients, lots of fragrance, so the user doesn't get a whiff of the underlying chemicals. They compromise on the quality of the ingredients for that result, and sell millions of bottles of the stuff.
All I can say is that the performance of the Grooming Dept's soaps is extraordinary, the scents are very nice, and now that I'm tuned into it, I know from the underlying scent that it's a Grooming Dept soap. And that, to me, is a good thing.