tokenaccount I apologize for mistaking you as the writer, however, I inferred from the posting that you were. Obviously I'm mistaken. I don't follow your logic. If I've not published an article I'm not qualified to comment on or criticize any articles? If I've never composed music I'm not qualified to comment on or criticize music? Its my belief that if someone has the desire and the courage to write an opinion piece and publish it then they should also be willing to accept any comment or criticism of that piece whether its fair or not. That just goes with the territory. The writer of that article was criticizing other writers who he believed weren't being sufficiently rigorous in their approach to reviews and I read that as being elitist overly critical of sincere lay persons in their attempts to share their enthusiasm with wet shaving. The article triggered a fair amount of comment and dialogue which is a good thing. Free speech being what it is and all - people are free to write reviews of varying quality and people are free to comment on and even criticize whats been written, even if they themselves have never written an article nor have any desire to.
Mark
Mark